The Wrath of the Lamb is one of the great paradoxes of Christianity…
“There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire out of a bush; he looked, and the bush was blazing, yet it was not consumed. Then Moses said, ‘I must turn aside and look at this great sight, and see why the bush is not burned up.” (Exodus 3: 2-3)
“They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered in the wilderness.
Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did.” (1 Corinthians 10:2-6)
“Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.”( Luke 13: 2-5)
Father, Your Love never fails. Keep me from danger and provide for all my needs. Teach me to be thankful for Your Gifts. Confident in Your Love, may I be holy by sharing Your Life, and grant me forgiveness of my sins. May Your unfailing Love turn me from sin and keep me on the way that leads to you. Help me to grow in Christian love. Let me make amends, in love, where I can that I may find good will and reconcile again with whom I have wronged and come to you again and place my gift upon your altar. Ora Pro Nobis.
Chesterton challenges society’s thinking about innocence and good as being weak and meek (in that erroneous idea of the term). Instead, he rightly sees them as powerful, even fear-inspiring and that “Christianity [is] daring…and the wrath of the Lamb is its great paradox.” We follow in the Lenten readings for today a theme of a burning bush representing the good God whose sole aim has been to deliver his people from bondage to sin by way of a law and miraculous events. Then a progression of two symbols: From God as a burning bush to Jesus as a fear-inspiring lamb who, warns his disciples as part of their delivery from sin: “repent or perish!” What an astounding paradox! But even more pointedly, Chesterton takes us a bit further out of the childish tendency of distancing ourselves from the responsibility God is calling us to when we say that God is a mere symbol of goodness. That keeps things impersonal and interferes with real repentance, redemption and reconciliation. He turns the thought rightly on its head and states that goodness is a symbol of God! So that means we must act in goodness towards others to show that God is in us. It’s now personal, for us and in how we treat others.
“An allegory nowadays means taking something that does not exist as a symbol of something that does exist. We believe, at least most of us do, that sin does exist. We believe (on highly insufficient grounds) that a dragon does not exist. So we make the unreal dragon an allegory of the real sin. But that is not what [William] Blake meant when he made the lamb the symbol of innocence. He meant that there really is behind the universe an eternal image called the Lamb, of which all living lambs are merely the copies or the approximation. He held that eternal innocence to be an actual and even an awful thing. He would not have seen anything comic, any more than the Christian Evangelist saw anything comic, in talking about the Wrath of the Lamb. If there were a lamb in one of Aesop’s fables, Aesop would never be so silly as to represent him as angry. But Christianity is more daring than Aesop, and the wrath of the Lamb is its great paradox. If there is an immortal lamb, a being whose simplicity and freshness are for ever renewed, then it is truly and really a more creepy idea to horrify that being into hostility than to defy the flaming dragon or challenge darkness or the sea. No old wolf or world-worn lion is so awful as a creature that is always young—a creature that is always newly born. But the main point here is simpler. It is merely that Blake did not mean that meekness was true and the lamb only a pretty fable. If anything he meant that meekness was a mere shadow of the everlasting lamb. The distinction is essential to anyone at all concerned for this rooted spirituality which is the only enduring sanity of mankind. The personal is not a mere figure for the impersonal; rather the impersonal is a clumsy term for something more personal than common personality. God is not a symbol of goodness. Goodness is a symbol of God. ” – G. K. Chesterton, William Blake, 1910